🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.